sagansense:

Virgin Galactic ‘not much of a space flight’, says astronaut Chris Hadfield

High-profile Canadian praises concept but says space tourists are ‘just going to go up and fall back down again’

Chris Hadfield, the Canadian astronaut whose tweeted photos, videos and rendition of David Bowie’s Space Oddity brought him global fame during a stint aboard the International Space Station, has questioned what kind of experience future space tourists will have with Virgin Galactic, saying they are “just going to go up and fall back down again”.

The 54-year-old, who spent five months commanding the ISS this year, also said the nature of space travel meant that at some point it appeared inevitable that a Virgin Galactic craft would crash.

Hadfield nonetheless praises the Virgin Galactic concept, under which passengers who have booked seats with a $250,000 deposit will fly to 68 miles above Earth and experience zero gravity. He says the Virgin chief, Richard Branson, has been in touch with him for advice.

Hadfield, whose recording of the Bowie song, with a video shot inside the ISS, has been watched more than 18m times on YouTube, said sign-ups for Virgin Galactic, such as Paris Hilton, might be disappointed if they expect an experience on the lines of the space blockbuster Gravity.

“I’m all for the idea. I commend him for it. But it’s not much of a space flight. I’m not sure she knows what she’s paying for. She may think she’s going to … see the universe and stars whipping by. None of that’s happening. They’re just going to go up and fall back down again. They’ll get a few minutes of weightlessness, and they’ll see the black of the universe. And they’ll see the curve of the Earth and the horizon, because they’ll be above the air. But whether that’ll be enough for the quarter-million-dollar price tag? I don’t know…eventually they’ll crash one. Because it’s hard. They’re discovering how hard. They wanted to fly years ago and faced a lot of obstacles, but he’s a brave entrepreneur and I hope he succeeds. The more people who can see the world this way, the better off we are.”

In his new memoir, An Astronaut’s Guide To Life On Earth, Hadfield argues that space travel carries inherent risks, not least because of the relative lack of testing of any spacecraft. He writes:

“No aeroplane you’ve ever gotten into had less than thousands of flights before they took their first passenger. Because vehicles are unsafe at first. We only flew the [space] shuttle 135 times total. Every flight was a radical test flight. With really high stakes.”

In a Guardian interview, Hadfield also explains the complexities of life aboard the ISS, where the isolation and tiny number of inhabitants means everyone must be multi-talented:

“We are our own town. Every single skill that exists in a town, we have to have on board. There are six of us, then three leave and are replaced by another three. But if they have a problem on the way up, then there’s three of you. So every trio that goes up has to have all the skills necessary for the entire time.”

A spokeswoman for Virgin Galactic described Hadfield as “a good friend and supporter”, and said there was a huge difference between his long space flights and those planned for paying passengers.

She said: “We are expecting to fly Richard and his children next year in the world’s most tested spacecraft and have emphasised since the start that commercial service will only commence once we fully understand and can satisfactorily manage the risks involved. There are no shortcuts.”

Source: guardian

Read more

Late last month Matthew Plummer-Fernandez, the 31-year-old creative technologist for Goldsmith College’s Interaction Research Studio at the University of London, released what he’s calling ‘Disarming Corruptor,’ a piece of free software designed to distort 3D-printable blueprints such that only another user with the app and the knowledge of a certain key combination can reverse the distortion and print the object. That means any controversial file–say, a figurine based on Mickey Mouse or another copyrighted or patented shape, or the 3D-printable gun created earlier this year known as the Liberator–could be ‘encrypted’ and made available on a public repository for 3D-printing blueprints like the popular site Thingiverse without tipping off those who would try to remove the file.

Read more

afrofuturistaffair:

afrofuturistaffair:

THE BLACK TRIBBLES x AFROFUTURIST AFFAIR RETURN TO OCTAVIA CITY!

Inspired by Hugo and Nebula Award winning author, the late Octavia Butler, OCTAVIA CITY presents original tales of Afrofuturism, science fiction fused with perspectives born from the African diaspora. 

The Black Tribbles Radio show is CALLING ALL WRITERS AND STORYTELLERS OF BLACK SCI-FI & AFROFUTURISM for OCTAVIA CITY Pt. 2, original tales of Afrofuturism, w/ return special guest Rasheedah Phillips of The AfroFuturist Affair!

You are invited to share your stories with the world on Thursday, November 7, 2013 from 8-11pm LIVE on the BLACK TRIBBLES radio show w/ co-host Gabriel Bryant of Stepping Into Tomorrow on Gtown RadioMusical soundscape provided by DJ AURA of Places & SPaces.

Part One and Part Two of the first Octavia City event. 

AND OUR STORIES WILL BE…
Spirit Warriors: A Mother’s Milk by Adanze Asante
Insem Nation: Melinda and the Grub by Ras Mashramani
Outcasts by Valjeanne Jeffers
Tablature by Naila Mattison-Jones
Ninja Fishing by Lisa Bolekaja
Blue by Joy KMT

We will also feature short stories by hosts Rasheedah Phillips and Kennedy Allen aka Storm Tribble.

See you on GTown radio Thursday Nov 7th @ 8p for our RETURN TO OCTAVIA CITY!

Read more

The second way today’s plutocrats flex their political muscle is more novel. Matthew Bishop and Michael Green, a pair of business writers, have called this approach “philanthrocapitalism” — activist engagement with public policy and social problems. This isn’t the traditional charity of supporting hospitals and museums, uncontroversial good causes in which sitting on the board can offer the additional perk of status in the social elite. Philanthrocapitalism is a more self-consciously innovative and entrepreneurial effort to tackle the world’s most urgent social problems; philanthrocapitalists deploy not merely the fortunes they accumulated, but also the skills, energy and ambition they used to amass those fortunes in the first place.

Bill Gates is the leading philanthrocapitalist, and he has many emulators — nowadays, having your own policy-oriented think tank is a far more effective status symbol among the super-rich than the mere conspicuous consumption of yachts or private jets. Philanthrocapitalism can be partisan — George Soros, one of the pioneers of this new approach, backed a big effort to try to prevent the re-election of George W. Bush — but it is most often about finding technocratic, evidence-based solutions to social problems and then advocating their wider adoption.

Philanthrocapitalism, particularly when you agree with the basic values of the capitalist in charge, can achieve remarkable things. Consider the work the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has done on malaria, or the transformative impact of Mr. Soros’s Open Society Foundations in Eastern Europe.

Mr. Bloomberg took philanthrocapitalism one step further — he used his résumé and his wealth to win elected political office. In City Hall, Mr. Bloomberg’s greatest achievements were technocratic triumphs — restricting smoking in public places, posting calorie counts and championing biking. As he prepares for life after political office, he is already honing the more typical plutocratic skill of using his money to shape public policy by energetically engaging in national battles over issues like gun control and immigration reform.

At its best, this form of plutocratic political power offers the tantalizing possibility of policy practiced at the highest professional level with none of the messiness and deal making and venality of traditional politics. You might call it the Silicon Valley school of politics — a technocratic, data-based, objective search for solutions to our problems, uncorrupted by vested interests or, when it comes to issues like smoking or soft drinks, our own self-indulgence.

But the same economic forces that have made this technocratic version of plutocratic politics possible — particularly the winner-take-all spiral that has increased inequality — have also helped define its limits. Surging income inequality doesn’t create just an economic divide. The gap is cultural and social, too. Plutocrats inhabit a different world from everyone else, with different schools, different means of travel, different food, even different life expectancies. The technocratic solutions to public-policy problems they deliver from those Olympian heights arrive in a wrapper of remote benevolence. Plutocrats are no more likely to send their own children to the charter schools they champion than they are to need the malaria cures they support.

Read more

designedconflictterritories:

Occupy The Cloud – James Bridle (via @jamesbridle)

I realised it would be possible to make a very public work; and there was no point in being subtle…

Edward Snowden has revealed that we are not moving toward a surveillance state: we live in the heart of one.” Paglen asserts that networked technologies as they are employed now do “not merely provide the capacity for “turnkey tyranny”—they render any other future all but impossible.” Powerful organisations which are cavalier with democratic rights are also cavalier with personal data and privacy: the two are linked, directly.

The depredations of corporations and governments on the internet reveal that it, too, is only a potential commons: not a zone of freedom, but one of conflict and power. We have re-discovered the efficacy of spatial protest: we can take the banks to protest unjust tax arrangements, but can we occupy the datacentres over the same issues?

Read more