That Luddites exist isn’t earth-shattering news, by any stretch, but the real issue has never been that people “hate” new technology, for what it does to “humanity.” The problem with Luddism and Neo-Luddism is that it represents a perspective which takes the ever-widening aspects of our emerging future and reacts to them with blanket fear and distrust, rather than a wary hope.

Blind hope is a naive proposition. It is one in which we sit in optimism, absent any evidence that it might actually pay off in that direction. It is one which ignores the very real dangers and pitfalls of new situations, and the opportunities for unintended consequences to rear their heads. However, the fallacious notion of the “slippery slope” of technological progress– that it’ll cause us to descend into a dystopian future where everything we are and do is controlled by corporations, or disassembled into grey goo–is one based in blind fear. These have the same basic components, they’re just pointed in different directions. Blind fear takes something new, something unknown, and says that unknowns are terrifying and should be destroyed before they can destroy us. Blind fear says that there is nothing good which can come from the new. And while the groups in question may not see themselves as reactionary, on an even reading it’s hard to see them as anything but.

What is the nature of technology that we drive toward? Why do we drive toward it, at all? How do we apply that motivation, and what do we value in the mechanisms and effects of our creation? These are the questions that we can ask, if we don’t want to be blindly optimistic or pessimistic about our future. We can ask these questions and then seek to address them, recognising that whatever answers we find may not be–and most likely will not be–permanent solutions to our problems. There are groups working now, in academia, public policy, and practical solution-building to help people think of different things than the utopian promise and the dystopian terror of our current work at building a future for ourselves.

Read more

Lost Arcana: Wealth, risk, and stuff

vruba:

Via Anne Galloway on Twitter, I just saw Living With Less. A Lot Less, an opinion piece in the New York Times.

I run into some version of this essay by some moneybags twig-bishop about once a year, and it bugs me every time.

Here’s the thing. Wealth is not a number of…

Lost Arcana: Wealth, risk, and stuff

Read more "Lost Arcana: Wealth, risk, and stuff"

fragua:

I liberated this billboard. It was a damn cold winter night in the desert but the moon stared down at me condescendingly and said “Are you gonna fucking do this?!” I just thought “Idle No More” & “get your ass out tha car!” Long story short, I ended up with cactus in my knee cause the moon didn’t feel like lighting my way and another billboard on the notch. (at I-25, Bernalillo, NM)

Read more

harveyjames:

The World fish drift through space absorbing the light from neighbouring stars.  The solar energy stored in their bodies powers the homes of the peaceloving creatures who live in the pyramids and domes carved into the rocks upon their backs, as well as the undulating, bioluminescent scales and fins of the great fish. However, it’s said that the crystals on their foreheads are capable of firing a wave of psychic energy capable of destroying an entire planet. 

Read more