Thing is… you show me an astronomer who thinks he or she knows what’s going on in this solar system and I will show you a fucking liar. Our own moon:

• Is almost a billion years older than the earth, and may even be older than the sun.
• Lunar dust on the 5.3 billion year old moon rocks is a billion years older still, possibly indicating the planetoid travelled through an older part of space.
• Having abandoned the idea that the moon is made up of ‘leftover mass’ from the formation of the earth (impossible due to gravity ‘clumping’ mass together), as well as the idea that it formed as a result of an impact on the earth (the geology doesn’t match the earth, it’s too old anyway, and there is no other debris from such an impact), mainstream astronomy has now accepted that the moon must have arrived from elsewhere and been caught in the earth’s gravitational field. Except here’s Isaac Asimov’s thoughts on the matter: “It’s too big to have been captured by the earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around the earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible.”
• From Our Occulted History:

The Big Whack theory has been tentatively accepted by conventional science for the simple reason that it seems to be the least impossible explanation currently available, yet it still does not explain how our moon ended up exactly one four-hundredth the size of the sun and in an orbit exactly one four-hundredth the distance between the sun and Earth while travelling at just the correct orbital speed to maintain that distance.

As science writer William Roy Shelton wrote, “it is important to remember that something had to put the moon at or near its present circular pattern around the earth. Just as an Apollo spacecraft circling the earth every 90 minutes while 100 miles high has to have a velocity of roughly 18,000 miles per hour to stay in orbit, so something had to give the moon the precisely required velocity for its weight and altitude… The point -and it is one seldom noted in considering the origin of the moon- is that it is extremely unlikely that any object would just stumble into the right combination of factors to stay in orbit. ‘Something’ had to put the moon at its altitude, on its course and at its speed. The question is: what was that ‘something’?”

• The moon has macsons (large, dense circular masses) under its surface that are so heavy they distort the trajectory of space craft. These heavy circular disks lie underneath and in the middle of the moon’s various maria… themselves a mystery as the moon isn’t considered volcanic.
• It creaks from internal ‘moonquakes’, leaks gas, and has either a very small core or none at all. When Apollo 12 sent its ascent stage crashing back to the moon after taking off, the whole thing rang like a bell for more than an hour. MIT’s Sean Solomon said this indicates “the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow.” And he said frightening, I’d suspect, because he was frightenedthat mainstream astronomy’s house of cards would tumble down.

Hollow moons? We’ve been here before. Phobos, one of Mars’s moons, is also hollow and leaking gas. None other than Carl Sagan, in 1966, agreed with the Soviet scientists who first suggested it was artificial. In Intelligent Life in The Universe, he said “a natural satellite cannot be a hollow object.” He subsequently backpedalled from this position but never quite disavowed it… because the physics of his earlier assertion are correct.

Earlier in the same decade, Eisenhower’s special adviser on space developments, S. Fred Singer, speculated that Phobos was an orbiting space station. NASA’s chief of applied mathematics said the same thing. So this belief has obviously been highly palatable to the upper orders for some time now. Because Phobos, you’ll recall, is the ‘moon’ that Buzz Aldrin himself said had monuments on it

Read more: http://runesoup.com/2013/12/a-wizards-guide-to-ufos/#ixzz2ngTQdSFg